November 30, 2020
Every story starts with a stranger in town or a journey. “Pa, we’re takin’ the wagon to Virginia City,” every story ends with “Golly gee, Wally. I thought we were goners.” True or False?
I really wanted to say, ‘nope, that’s not the way it works.’ And if I dig hard enough, I can probably find examples to contradict it. But there’s lots of truth to the premise.
Let’s start with my Free Wolves series. It’s backwards from the theory because each of my main characters is the stranger that came to town. Dot, Tasha, and Lori are the outsiders trying to fit in and find their place. Here’s Tasha’s (from Wolves’ Knight) beginning:
Her tactical knife slid easily from its ankle sheath. With a curse, Tasha leaped out of the leather chair and slid across the wooden conference table, praying she’d make it in time.
Although the stories are from the same ‘world’ they feature different characters and each story can be read as a stand-alone. Each story introduces a new stranger and a new situation.
The Harmony Duprie Mysteries are different. The Marquesa’s Necklace, the first one, opens with the stranger in town.
I first noticed him at the other end of the row when I glanced up to find another book. I recognize most of the regular patrons, and he wasn’t one of them.
But because each story is told in the same world, the little city of Oak Grove, the villain may not be a stranger but someone from Harmony’s town. Perhaps someone she didn’t know well, or doesn’t know at all. Or perhaps it’s someone she thought was a friend. (I’m trying not to give too many clues!) The Samurai’s Inro is a good example of this. (Yes, a minor character is from out of town, but the book doesn’t begin with him.)
In the sixth and final book of the series, the Ranger’s Dogtags, Harmony becomes the stranger in town after going on a journey. I got both tropes covered there!
How about those endings? “Golly gee, Wally. I thought we were goners.” There’s lots of books that this doesn’t hold true for—I’m thinking mostly of women’s fiction and romances. For my own books, I’ll argue that one a technicality. My stories combine romantic elements with action and adventure. Yes, my characters are placed in life-threatening situations, but I wrap every story up with the romance. Because I believe in happily ever after.
The next thing I knew, he’d pulled me into his arms and his lips were devouring mine.
I may have been a wee bit distracted with kissing him back, but I swear my toes curled, birds sang, and fireworks exploded in the background.
And magic happened.
Let’s find out what our other authors have to say by following the links below.
And, until next time, please stay safe,
November 30, 2020
Every story starts with a stranger in town or a journey. “Pa, we’re takin’ the wagon to Virginia City,” every story ends with “Golly gee, Wally. I thought we were goners.” True or False?
Rules:
1. Link your blog to this hop.
2. Notify your following that you are participating in this blog hop.
3. Promise to visit/leave a comment on all participants’ blogs.
4. Tweet/or share each person’s blog post. Use #OpenBook when tweeting.
5. Put a banner on your blog that you are participating.
Women’s Fiction/Romance often has some kind of conflict in it that gets resolved, so maybe it does apply to these genres?
Even without resolution, which is a yay or nay component of fiction, a journey or arrival by/of travel, adventure, character or event transpires. Or there is no story. I keep seeing this overthought, as I sort of expected. Structure, plot and devices are different subjects for discussion. This is a yes/no question. Whether the gunslinger, the alien or the volcano come to town, the ring or the message or the seventh diamond get delivered, good guys and bad guys or meteors clash they result in one or the other – stranger/journey or both. Nothing was said about resolution which is a device.
Extra points for spotting the denouement as optional. However, “but I wrap every story up with the romance. Because I believe in happily ever after.” Is Golly Gee Wally, I thought we were goners – a euphemism for denouement.
You know one can’t like your posts without Facebook, or so it seems.
That’s weird. I’ll have to see if I can figure out what setting that is.
I see your point, Phil. I took the question literally. Looking at it philosophically, without a journey of some sort there is no story. As to denouement, I get frustrated by the modern device of ending stories in cliffhangers to encourage readers to buy the next book. Drives me up a wall!
I too took it literally. Yes, you can have a journey of the soul. Conflict is a catalyst for change in the characters.
I use cliffhangers and readers seem to enjoy it. I don’t use them exclusively, however, and since I’m writing a series, I try to resolve some issue(s) in every book. I ended “Winter’s Reckoning”, the latest book in Transformation Project, with a teaser for the next book, but with no cliffhanger involving a main character, so we’ll see how many readers don’t go to the next book.
Teasers are fine. I bet the readers who are invested in the series will buy the next book, even without the cliffhanger.
Hi Patricia, it seems that most of us are arriving at the viewpoint that there is a lot of truth in Tolstoy’s quote. It depends on how widely you interpret it.